4.13.2008

Violence in the Classroom: It's Inexcusable

Recently, the news has shown light on many outbreaks of violence in the classroom. One of the latest stories was that of a student beating up a teacher, while another student taped the whole thing on a cell phone. The footage was then posted on the internet for everyone to see. When news stations picked up the story, they interviewed the teacher who was victimized. She explained that she had spoken with a principal about the incident, but the principal’s reply was unsympathetic. In fact, the principal even told her that perhaps she had motivated the student to act this way by using a “trigger word.”

How are our schools supposed to function with discipline cases like these? And how can we expect teachers to work in an environment where they are threatened? I was able to find postings on blogs on the topic of physical confrontations in the classroom to which I posted comments of my own. Since I plan on joining the teaching force, this issue is obviously one of importance and concern. I anticipate having to deal with a lot of behavior issues, but I seriously hope that I am never confronted with any forms of physical contact.

My first comment is about students being violent with teachers, which is what we see more often. My opinions seem to be much in line with others that are posted. With general agreement about what should be done, it makes one wonder why we are still having so many of these behavior cases. My second post, however, is in response to the question, “Should a teacher be allowed to physically punish a student?” It is an interesting topic, and the question was directed toward members of different cultures in order to see the variations of punishment across the world. I think you will find both comments interesting and encourage you to visit each site.

Comment: As someone who is looking forward to teaching in public schools, the thought of being assaulted by a student scares me to death. No one should ever be afraid to go to work, and the classroom is no different. Just because the majority of the students are under eighteen does not mean their violent actions should be taken any less seriously. In fact, their young age only makes a lenient punishment worse; they need to suffer consequence that force them to realize that violence will not be tolerated in this country.

I completely agree that students who are threats in the classroom should be sent to alternative schools. If other students see that this behavior is tolerated and does not call for expulsion, then the message being sent is that it is okay to act this way. Instead, students should be expelled if they show any acts of violence that are considered threats to teachers, administrators, or other students. If not expelled, they should at least be suspended for a period of time during which they must go to the alternative school. Ideally, these schools would be boarding schools with structures comparable to that of prisons. Let us give these students a taste of true punishment, so that they learn their lessons.

However, I do wonder about the funding for the schools. I have heard all the statistics about more money being spent on prisons than on schools. I would hate to see the funding for alternative schools be taken from public schools so that they suffer. Would it not be great if the parents had to pay to send their children there? Most would agree that most behavior issues are a result of a bad home life. If a student is willing to assault a teacher, he or she obviously has no respect for authority, which most definitely stems from bad parenting.

At any rate, these students cannot under any circumstance be allowed to remain in the classroom after proving that they are violent threats. If there are no consequences for bad behavior, then students will never understand that it is not tolerated.

Comment: I too remember the days when principals had a paddle in their desk, and any behavior that was completely unacceptable would constitute a paddling on the behind. These days, any physical punishment by adults is completely unacceptable. Considering that most parents would be uncomfortable with other adults giving this kind of discipline, I agree that paddles probably should not be used at school. Along the same lines, teachers should not be slapping wrists with rulers.

Not to say that I am against this kind of discipline; I just think these methods should be used at home by parents and at their own discretion. My mom’s spankings were quite effective, and as long as they are given properly, I see nothing wrong with that form of disciplining. With the way law suits occur in this country, it is best that this discipline is only used cautiously by a student’s parent. Let me clarify that by “this type of discipline,” I mean a slightly stinging slap on the behind—anything else would be too much.

All in all, I think that any violence, whether it be a slapping on the behind for disciplinary reasons or a student pushing around a teacher should stay completely out of the classroom. The environment should be a learning environment that is a safe place for everyone. Any student who touches anyone else inappropriately should automatically be removed from the classroom. The same goes for any teacher who touches a student or another member of the faculty. While I realize that sometimes teachers end up needing to discipline students because they have not been disciplined at home and that I just admitted spankings are an effective punishment, the truth is that the teacher is NOT the parent. Therefore, he or she should sent serious discipline cases to the administrators who can then use detention, parent conferences, or suspension as they see fit.

4.06.2008

Birth Control in Middle School: When Educators Become Parents

The decision to offer birth control to middle schoolers in Portland, Maine, has caused quite the commotion. On one hand, the age of middle schoolers typically ranges from eleven to fifteen, and many would argue that at school officials should not be handing out birth control like candy to such young students. The general fear is that this act makes it seem okay for students to engage in such a mature act. On the other hand, the outbreak in pregnancies indicates that middle schoolers are having sex. Not many students fall into this category, only a handful, but the public must be aware that the society in which Americans live encourages sexual activity more so than it inhibits it. Just look at who is idolized in the U.S.: Britney Spears come quickly to mind. Not surprisingly her sixteen-year-old sister, Jamie Lynn, is expecting a baby soon.

The argument against giving contraceptives to teenagers is not a difficult one to form. In the state of Maine, the age for consent is fourteen, given that the other person involved in the act is less than three years older. Not only are many of the girls that are having sex in middle school breaking the law, but more importantly, they are putting themselves at serious risk. Pregnancy is not the only consequence of unprotected sex. Sexual intercourse puts those involved at risk for dangerous sexually transmitted diseases, which only condoms can help prevent. Likewise, consider the emotional stress that these young students are going through--sex is commonly known as a very mature act, and most would agree that it is not intended for a pre-teen. Clearly, these students are suffering from poor parenting. But parenting is not something that can be controlled with a pill.

For some good parents who find this to be ludicrous, they can find comfort by knowing that in order for a student to use this school health center, they have to sign a waiver giving parental consent. Unfortunately, this means that the school nurse cannot even give their child aspirin in the case that he or she does not feel well. But if they are bothered by the fact that what happens in the health center cannot be disclosed to parents by law, then that will be a sacrifice they make. A parent can always choose to dismiss his or her student from class and take them to a family doctor instead. If they really are good parents though, they should trust that their children are making good, healthy decisions by the time they are in middle school.

The big picture here is that sex in middle school is a result of change in culture. The times are changing and so are the kids. While many want to teach abstinence, equally many want to teach protection. This brings about the question of teaching in general: "Whose responsibility is it to educate these children on sex?" The school or the parents? if it is left to the parents, then there are going to be a lot of issues. Parents are not legally responsible for sexual education; however, they are legally responsible for sending their children to school. Therefore, sexual education by the school is the best way to make sure everyone hears it. But on the flip side, school officials can only teach from an educational standpoint--they can not compete with a parent's abililty to instill morals. As long as schools are doing their best to explain that sexual activity is a mature and risky act, then they are doing job. And if they find out that students are having sex, then teaching them the best methods to stay safe is also appropriate, even if it means giving a twelve-year-old the pill. By no means does this imply that these nurses enjoy giving out contraceptives. The thought of a middle school student having sex would probably keep any health care provider up at night, but I am sure the thought of a middle school student having a baby is worse.


The good news is that according to health officials, there has not been any increase in the number of middle school students who are choosing to have sex, which should calm the nerves of anyone thinking that this is going to encourage pre-teens to have sex. Personally, I think that my middle school's method of teaching birth control was quite effective. Unfortunately, it is much too unconventional to be used anywhere else. Growing up in a small town in Mississippi, right smack in the bible belt, educators just scared us out of having sex. They assured us that God would punish us for sex before marriage and that you could get pregnant just by getting too close. Coming to California has shown me that as much as we do not want to think about it, there are things going on in our country that call for a change in management. If these students need birth control, then we cannot ignore the truth, no matter how sad it may be.
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.